They went to take photographs of the moon. Then they looked up.

More info and sources at bottom.

Find me elsewhere:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/philedwards…
Twitter: https://twitter.com/philedwardsinc
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/philedwardsinc

Where I get my music (Free trial affiliate link):
https://share.epidemicsound.com/olkrqv

My camera, as of February 2022 (affiliate link):
https://amzn.to/3HDcWVz
My main lens: https://amzn.to/3IteXEK
My main light: https://amzn.to/3pjO0M8
My main light accessory: https://amzn.to/3M6eL0j

This video started initially when I was interested in photography history and NASA. As I did research though, I kinda narrowed on Earthrise – I was fascinated by how such a famous photo could be such an unplanned, nearly accidental thing. Even if you don’t buy my argument, I hope you enjoy seeing some of these amazing photos and learning about some of the cool experiments.

Sources:
Here’s a NASA 101 that’s very digestible. It focuses on still photography during Apollo and helped me get my footing.
https://www.nasa.gov/history/astronau…

This is where all the photos are sourced from.
https://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/
It’s surprisingly complicated to find the right or best copies of the photo, and it ends up being a bit of a judgment call. This site provides what they say are unedited scans in really high resolution (as well as copies in more manageable sizes and with some editing). I felt like I didn’t really color correct the images I used “right,” but I preferred having duller images to ones that had been super edited in ways I couldn’t judge. Anyway, your mileage may vary – check it out for yourself!

The Apollo Flight Journal:
https://www.nasa.gov/history/afj/ap08fj/
This is your best place to check quotes, chronology, and get all the little details on events, as well as clarifications on confusing stuff. So I think this is a fun place to nerd out.

Here’s a version of the Earthrise recreation NASA did (a few copies all over).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDf0O…

Here’s Jennifer Levasseur’s dissertation. This really is what gave me my footing. For a while, I thought I’d need to figure out how to include her in it because it felt like a straight up adaptation. But as I read on, there were a lot of places I diverged and the scope of her thing was a lot bigger.

However, you’ll see where I got the vibe of this video and why I focused primarily on Hasselblad and Ansco Autoset.

Very influential and worth a read!
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/documen…

Here’s that color patch photography paper:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19720…

Here’s a very thorough overview of NASA photography, by NASA c.1972.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1…

In general, this is where I got all the other documents you see in the video. A quick search should help you find them but if you can’t, please feel free to email me. This is just such a gold mine though, nobody talks about a lot of the stuff in here.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search

OK, I can’t resist one more specific link here — nice synopsis of Apollo 8 photography specifically. This is what I’m talking about – they get really niche! I just had to figure out how to keep it detailed and still tell a story.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1…

Oh, here’s John Glenn’s memoir!
https://amzn.to/484KOaK
I won’t pretend I read it though – I was just mining for camera facts! He actually calls the Ansco Autoset a Minolta, which I think is wrong because Minolta bought them later (Smithsonian calls it an Autoset). Anyway, the dude is like the last American hero, so I wasn’t gonna call him out on that in the video, hence the elision in the quote.

[…]