There are Roman ruins in London. And they are located… underground.
And this is not the only amazing attraction hiding under London.
Today we will descend step by step into the underground depths of this amazing city and find out: What is under London?
RYV Team:
Voice Over: Kent Bleazard
Thanks for the footage:
Kathryn and Edward, “The Wright Life” – @TheWrightLifeTravelChannel
It is estimated that more than 12,000 metric tons of bombs were dropped on London and nearly 30,000 civilians were killed by enemy action. In the post-war era, the city had a mammoth task ahead of it. In this video we explore how London re-emerged from being almost completely destroyed during the Blitz – and how the city wears these scars of the Blitz that you can see in plain sight.
This video has been several months in the making and I’ve enjoyed every second of putting it together. Let me know your thoughts in the comments. I’d like to thank Lima Charlie for letting me use his camera, mic, and flat!
00:00 – Intro
01:04 – Gap sites (Notting Hill)
02:25 – The Barbican Estate
03:57 – Burgess Park
04:54 – St Mary’s Newington, Kennington
05:23 – Christ Church, Lambeth North
06:05 – Ladbroke Gardens
06:36 – Walcott Square, Kennington
07:13 – St Thomas’ Hospital
Hello from the Netherlands! In this video I’m comparing Dutch and UK approaches to urban planning – from street design and greenery, to cycling and even bins and street lights. I think there’s a lot we can learn from the Netherlands which would make the UK’s towns and cities even better – which may even save public sector services and the NHS some money too.
00:00 – Intro
00:10 – Urecht motorway to canal
02:10 – Greenery
04:32 – Paving
05:20 – Good Street Design
08:40 – Bins
09:39 – Amsterdam
14:44 – Cycling
17:48 – Amsterdam Noord
20:38 – Brandevoort
23:13 – Street lights
Great video from Streetscapes going into much more detail about why Dutch street design is genius: • What New York Could Learn From Amsterdam’s…
More information from Not Just Bikes about Amsterdam’s plan to remove 10,000 car parking spaces from its city centre: • Why Amsterdam is Removing 10,000 Parking S…
A bit about the parking spaces removed from one Amsterdam canal to be replaced with a park on top and underground parking beneath: https://www.zja.nl/en/Albert-Cuypgara…
The development of Amsterdam Noord: https://bureauvaneig.nl/project/elzen…
More information about Brandevoort: https://www.visitbrabant.com/en/locat…
Sources:
Age UK, 2025. Lifting The Lid: Looking for a better understanding of local authorities and public toilet provision in London. https://www.ageuk.org.uk/bp-assets/gl…
Case, M. 2010. Why Not Abolish Laws of Urinary Segregation? In Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing. Molotch, H. & Noren, L.
Donohue, J. 2005. Fantasies of Empire: The Empire Theatre of Varieties and the Licensing Controversy of 1894.
Hall, E., 1977, in Destiny Obscure: Autobiographies of childhood, education and family from the 1820s to the 1920s. Burnett, J., ed. 1984. pg 125
Kogan, T. S. 2010. Sex Separation: The Cure-All For Victorian Social Anxiety. In Toilet: Public Restrooms and the Politics of Sharing. Molotch, H. & Noren, L.
McCabe, S. 2012. The Provision of Underground Public Conveniences in London with Reference to Gender Differentials, 1850s-1980s. https://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/6093/1/MA…
Nazerali, I., Ramster, G., & Bichard, J-A. Publicly Accessible Toilets after COVID-19. Public Toilets Research Unit, Royal College of Art.
Penner, B. 2001. A World of Unmentionable Suffering: Women’s Public Conveniences In Victorian London. In Journal of Design History Vol. 14 No.1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3527271
Penner, B., 2013. The First Public Toilet? Rose Street, Soho. In Victorian Review, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Spring 2013), pp. 26-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24496993
Ramster G., Greed, C., & Bichard, J-O. How Inclusion Can Exclude: The Case of Public Toilet Provision for Women.
Rappaport, E. D. 2000. Shopping For Pleasure: Women in the Making of London’s West End.
Shaw, B. 1909. The Unmentionable Case For Women’s Suffrage. In Practical Politics: Twentieth-Century Views on Politics and Economics, 1976. Hubenka, L. J., ed.
Stanwell-Smith, R., et al., 2019. Taking The P***: The Decline Of The Great British Public Toilet. Royal Society For Public Health. https://www.rsph.org.uk/static/upload…
What makes someone real?
And if we met a machine that could feel, how would we even know?
____________
Join on Patreon for members only videos:
patreon.com/user?u=83887531
____________
In Blade Runner, the Voight-Kampff test measures empathy, not intelligence, not memory. Just an involuntary emotional response. But what happens when the machines we build can fake that too?
In this episode, we’re breaking down the science and story behind the Voight-Kampff test. From Turing’s original challenge to AI mimicry, to the rise of affective computing and the real-world limits of how we define consciousness.
This isn’t just about science fiction anymore.
It’s about how we decide what counts as sentient and what happens if we’re wrong.
Topics Covered:
-What the Voight-Kampff test really measured
-Why empathy doesn’t guarantee humanity
-The shift from detection to control in Blade Runner 2049
-Why we still don’t have a test for consciousness
-What AI mimicry tells us (and hides from us)
And why language like “reasoning” and “emotion” misleads us when applied to machines
This one’s for the sci-fi fans, the AI researchers, and anyone who’s ever wondered what proof would ever be enough.